I was reading a blog by Bill Venners about duck typing and kind of liked the following extract
...Don't check whether it IS-a duck: check whether it QUACKS-like-a duck, WALKS-like-a duck, etc, etc, depending on exactly what subset of duck-like behaviour you need...
Its funny how we advocate the same thing in Java in spite of being statically typed , when we talk about programming to interface not to implementation. As long as it QUACKS, WALKS like a duck, we shouldn't care about its type.
Stuff about software development, agile and testing
Tuesday, July 10, 2007
Labels
- agile (4)
- agile testing (1)
- build tool (1)
- design (1)
- DSL (1)
- duck typing (1)
- eclipse (1)
- ejb3 (1)
- Fluent Interface (1)
- grails groovy (1)
- groovy (1)
- gwt (1)
- hacking (1)
- haskell (1)
- java (1)
- javascript (1)
- jvm (1)
- languages (1)
- mac (1)
- pipes (1)
- programming (1)
- qa (1)
- rant (2)
- ruby (6)
- sas (1)
- scala (3)
- scripting (2)
- software rewrite (1)
- statically typed (1)
- testing (4)
- two phase commit (1)